The tank is over and I am so happy, I knew it would be a shorter run then some of the 20 years other teams have gone through with little to no hope. We have ownership that is involved. The recent news of the Clippers and just pure corruption has got me thinking about the worst ran franchise in the NBA (which I believe the NBA ones are worse than the NFL Browns so basically North American Sports). Many would say the Clippers are the worst with basically two scandals in the decade and just missing on not only numerous draft picks but also landing free agents and the team just burns them at the stake.
I would say the Sacramento Kings are even worse, especially in the last decade or two. They are irrelevant, lose players that consistently seem to leave and be better but mostly they just suck at ownership. Case in point they have fired two head coaches that were good, went on to win championships. I mean really they could have kept Mike Malone or Mike Brown but they let both walk and the Kings continue to lose, dont hire a coach that people want and the ones that leave get rings. Malone earned in Denver and Brown in New York.
They had talent as well, they had Hali but somehow just let him walk, same with Fox. You could go back even further but for this post I dont think you have to.
Are the Kings the worst ran franchise in the NBA? A side note is like should we have kept Quinn? I dont think he wanted to be apart of a rebuild, again. I think the future is bright with Hardy and that is the right call and I am excited to see what he does with a green light for winning.