When it comes to the Cornell 7, many people are asking why the 50+ other men in the group chat didn't try to stop the assault, or even report it.
Speaking from personal experience, I can share that reporting it at my university would likely have had no impact on the perpetrators, and potentially negative impacts on those that reported it. (EDIT: I'm not excusing their cowardly behavior at all, they should have absolutely intervened in the moment. I'm just sharing further insight into what the path may have looked like if they tried to do something after the fact; if, for example, they slept through it and didn't see it until morning.)
Last year, I witnessed a university staff member sexually harass/assault a student. She asked me for help and I intervened, and recorded the confrontation that followed. At the urging of another uni staff member, I reported the incident to the Office of Dignity, Respect, and Consent.
That is where I learned that the university's policy is that they will not investigate reports of sexual harassment/assault submitted by a witness or bystander; they will only investigate complaints submitted directly from victims. The university's view is that this gives victims autonomy and choice.
This is dangerous for several reasons:
- This policy creates an environment where people can continue harassing and assaulting others, even when their behavior has been reported, because witness reports carry no consequences
- If a student is assaulted or harassed by someone they do not know, or are too incapacitated to recognise, a witness who does recognise the perpetrator cannot file a complaint
- This policy is followed even when the complaint is about a staff member
- This policy is followed even when there is video or photo evidence from the time of the event
- And as many of you know (unfortunately, personally) only a fraction of victims report assaults
In my case, I pushed the issue as far as I could because the situation involved a staff member and I was afraid for the victim, myself, and other students.
After DRC declined to investigate I reported the situation to his supervisors, who told me that HR said nothing could be done unless the victim reported the incident herself. They also told me that "false reports like these ruin peoples lives" and "if it had been as bad as you say, surely she [the victim] would come forward." After I reported to uni staff that I felt unsafe around the staff member in question because I had intervened, I was required to interact with him MORE after, including in one-on-one situations.
I even filed a complaint with the government watchdog, but they found that the case was outside of their remit because the university followed their own set policy.
So while I intervened on the night itself, nothing I did was able to protect future students from this person, and I suffered academically, professionally, and socially because of the situation.
I'm not saying this to excuse those 50+ men AT ALL. This is more about the responsibility UNIVERSITIES have to create safe spaces for women. We go there to learn and grow. We are not playthings.
EDIT: Seeing some comments that crimes/issues won't be investigated unless the victim is willing to report it. Universities spend countless energy, time, and resources investigating plagiarism. Students who commit plagiarism face consequences, leading up to and potentially including expulsion. Plagiarism, while not great, is a both fairly victimless and not a crime. So why are universities not willing to investigate/explore allegations, particularly when they concern a staff member who will have continued access to students, unless the victim submits the complaint directly?